J/AJ/153/6  Local Tully-Fisher relation for dwarf galaxies (Karachentsev+, 2017)
================================================================================
The Local Tully-Fisher relation for dwarf galaxies.
    Karachentsev I.D., Kaisina E.I., Kashibadze O.G.
   <Astron. J., 153, 6-6 (2017)>
   =2017AJ....153....6K    (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
================================================================================
ADC_Keywords: Galaxy catalogs ; Morphology
Keywords: catalogs - cosmology: dark matter - galaxies: dwarf -
          galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

Abstract:
    We study different incarnations of the Tully-Fisher (TF) relation for
    the Local Volume (LV) galaxies taken from Updated Nearby Galaxy
    Catalog. The UNGC sample contains 656 galaxies with W_50_
    HI-line-width estimates, mostly belonging to low-mass dwarfs. Of them,
    296 objects have distances measured with accuracies better than 10%.
    For the sample of 331 LV galaxies having baryonic masses
    logM_bar_>5.8logM_{Sun}_, we obtain a relation
    logM_bar_=2.49logW_50_+3.97 with an observed scatter of 0.38dex. The
    largest factors affecting the scatter are observational errors in
    K-band magnitudes and W_50_ line widths for the tiny dwarfs, as well
    as uncertainty of their inclinations. We find that accounting for the
    surface brightness of the LV galaxies or their gas fraction, specific
    star-formation rate, or isolation index does not essentially reduce
    the observed scatter on the baryonic TF diagram. We also notice that a
    sample of 71 dSph satellites of the Milky Way and M31 with a known
    stellar velocity dispersion {sigma}* tends to follow nearly the same
    bTF relation, having slightly lower masses than that of late-type
    dwarfs.

Description:
    The raw observational data on 402 galaxies of the LV, including 71
    dSphs, are compiled in Table 5.

File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName    Lrecl    Records    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe          80          .    This file
table5.dat      81        402    Initial data for local volume galaxies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also:
 VIII/89 : Northern HI Parkes All Sky Survey Catalogue (HIPASS) (Wong+, 2006)
 VIII/73 : HI Parkes All Sky Survey Catalogue (HIPASS) (Meyer+, 2004)
 VII/155 : Third Reference Cat. of Bright Galaxies (RC3) (de Vaucouleurs+ 1991)
 J/AJ/151/52    : The HIZOA-S survey (Staveley-Smith+, 2016)
 J/AJ/147/13    : Disturbers of nearby giant galaxies (Karachentsev+, 2014)
 J/AJ/146/46    : Star Formation Rate in nearby galaxies (Karachentsev+, 2013)
 J/AJ/145/101   : Updated nearby galaxy catalog (Karachentsev+, 2013)
 J/AJ/128/16    : HIPASS Bright Galaxy Catalog (Koribalski+, 2004)
 J/AJ/127/2031  : Catalog of neighboring galaxies (Karachentsev+, 2004)
 J/A+A/377/801  : Fourth list of the Karachentsev catalog (Huchtmeier+, 2001)
 J/A+AS/141/469 : First list of the Karachentsev catalog (Huchtmeier+, 2000)
 http://www.sao.ru/lv/lvgdb/ : Catalog and Atlas of the Local Volume Galaxies

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 18  A18   ---     Name     Galaxy name in well-known catalogs
  20- 21  I2    h       RAh      Hour of Right Ascension (J2000)
  23- 24  I2    min     RAm      Minute of Right Ascension (J2000)
  26- 29  F4.1  s       RAs      Second of Right Ascension (J2000)
      31  A1    ---     DE-      Sign of the Declination (J2000)
  32- 33  I2    deg     DEd      Degree of Declination (J2000)
  35- 36  I2    arcmin  DEm      Arcminute of Declination (J2000)
  38- 39  I2    arcsec  DEs      Arcsecond of Declination (J2000)
  41- 42  I2    ---     TT       [-3/10]? Morphology type code (1)
  44- 47  F4.2  ---     b/a      [0/1]? Apparent axial ratio (2)
  49- 51  I3    km/s    W50      [3/510]? H I line with at 50% level from
                                  maximum (W_50_) (3)
      52  A1    ---   f_W50      [*] Flag "*" when W50 was determined by a
                                  relation Gaussian function (4)
  54- 58  F5.2  Mpc     Dist     [0.02/17] Galaxy distance
  60- 63  A4    ---   f_Dist     Flag for method used to obtain Dist (CMD, Cep,
                                  HB, RR, TRGB, or mem) (5)
  65- 69  F5.2 [Lsun]   logLKs   [3.19/11]? Log K_S_ band luminosity (log(L_K_))
  71- 75  F5.2 [Msun]   logMHI   [1.12/10.31]? Log hydrogen mass (logM_HI_)
  77- 81  F5.2 [Msun]   logMb    [2.97/10.88]? Log of baryonic mass (M_bar_) (6)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): According to the classification by de Vaucouleurs et al. 1976
     (Cat. VII/112) defined as follows:
     -3 = S0^-^;
     -2 = S0^0^;
     -1 = S0^+^;
      1 = Sa;
      2 = Sab;
      3 = Sb;
      4 = Sbc;
      5 = Sc;
      6 = Scd;
      7 = Sd;
      8 = Sdm;
      9 = Sm;
     10 = Im.
Note (2): Corresponding to the Holmberg isophote (~26.5mag/arcsec^2^) in B band.
Note (3): The main source of W_50_ data was LEDA, as well as the HI Parkes
     All-Sky Survey (HIPASS; Koribalski et al. 2004, Cat. J/AJ/128/16; Meyer et
     al. 2004, Cat. VIII/73; Wong et al. 2006, Cat. VIII/89; Staveley-Smith et
     al. 2016, Cat. J/AJ/151/52) and the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey
     (ALFALFA; Giovanelli et al. 2005AJ....130.2598G; Haynes et al. 2011,
     Cat. J/AJ/142/170). The references to individual W_50_ measurements are
     presented in the Local Volume Galaxies (LVG) database (Kaisina et al.
     2012AstBu..67..115K, http://www.sao.ru/lv/lvgdb/).
Note (4): Galaxy has only a dispersion and thus its W_50_ was determined  by a
     relation Gaussian function W_*_=2{sqrt}(2ln2)*{sigma}_*_.
Note (5): Methods used to obtain the distance are defined as follows:
     TRGB = By the Tip of the Red Giant Branch;
      Cep = From the Cepheid luminosity;
      mem = From galaxy membership in known groups with measured distances of
            other members;
      CMD = By the Color Magnitude Diagram using some prominent features or
            simultaneous distance and stellar population fitting;
       HB = By the Horizontal Branch;
       RR = From the luminosity of RR Lyrae stars.
Note (6): Logarithm of baryonic mass with parameters
     {Upsilon}^*^=0.60,{eta}=1.33. See text Section 6 for additional details.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

History:
    From electronic version of the journal

================================================================================
(End)                 Prepared by [AAS]; Sylvain Guehenneux [CDS]    13-Jun-2017
