J/ApJ/788/59 Parametric model for circumstellar disks gas mass (Williams+, 2014)
================================================================================
A parametric modeling approach to measuring the gas masses of circumstellar
disks.
    Williams J.P., Best W.M.J.
   <Astrophys. J., 788, 59 (2014)>
   =2014ApJ...788...59W    (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
================================================================================
ADC_Keywords: Models ; Stars, masses ; Effective temperatures
Keywords: circumstellar matter - planets and satellites: formation -
          protoplanetary disks

Abstract:
    The disks that surround young stars are mostly composed of molecular
    gas, which is harder to detect and interpret than the accompanying
    dust. Disk mass measurements have therefore relied on large and
    uncertain extrapolations from the dust to the gas. We have developed a
    grid of models to study the dependencies of isotopologue CO line
    strengths on disk structure and temperature parameters and find that a
    combination of ^13^CO and C^18^O observations provides a robust
    measure of the gas mass. We apply this technique to Submillimeter
    Array observations of nine circumstellar disks and published
    measurements of six well studied disks. We find evidence for selective
    photodissociation of C^18^O and determine masses to within a factor of
    about three. The inferred masses for the nine disks in our survey
    range from 0.7 to 6 M_Jup_, and all are well below the extrapolation
    from the interstellar medium gas-to-dust ratio of 100. This is
    consistent with the low masses of planets found around such stars, and
    may be due to accretion or photoevaporation of a dust-poor upper
    atmosphere. However, the masses may be underestimated if there are
    more efficient CO depletion pathways than those known in molecular
    clouds and cold cores.

Description:
    Circumstellar disks are relatively small, faint objects that have, to
    date, required long integrations with millimeter wavelength
    interferometers to study their molecular gas content. Consequently,
    only a small number of disks have been imaged in isotopologue lines
    and most analyses have been tailored to the individual object. Driven
    by the moderately large sample size but low signal-to-noise level in
    our data here, we use a different approach. Rather than analyze each
    disk individually, we create a large grid of models that span a wide
    range of disk parameters, particularly in gas mass, and compare with
    the data in a uniform way.

File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName      Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe            80        .   This file
table3.dat       131    18144   Parametric Model Output
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also:
 J/ApJ/784/62 : Circumstellar disks around binary stars in Taurus
                                                                 (Akeson+, 2014)

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  3  F3.1  Msun    M*       Stellar mass (0.5, 1.0)
   5- 10  F6.4  Msun    Mgas     Gas mass (0.0001, 0.0003, 0.0010, 0.0030, 
                                  0.0100, 0.0300, 0.1000)
  12- 14  F3.1  ---     gamma    Surface density power law index (0.0, 0.8, 1.5)
  16- 18  I3    AU      Rc       Characteristic disk radius (30, 60, 100, 200)
  20- 22  I3    K       Tmid1    Inner midplane temperature (100, 200, 300)
  24- 27  I4    K       Tatm1    Inner atmopsheric temperature 
                                  (500, 750, 1000, 1500)
  29- 32  F4.2  ---     q        Radial power law index (0.45, 0.55, 0.65)
  34- 35  I2    deg     Inc      Inclination (0, 45, 90)
  37- 41  F5.3  ---     ffreeze  Mass fraction where CO is frozen out
  43- 47  F5.3  ---     fdissoc  Mass fraction where CO is dissociated
  49- 54  F6.3  Jy.km/s FCO10    Integrated intensity of CO J=1-0 line
  56- 62  F7.3  Jy.km/s FCO21    Integrated intensity of CO J=2-1 line
  64- 70  F7.3  Jy.km/s FCO32    Integrated intensity of CO J=3-2 line
  72- 76  F5.3  Jy.km/s F13CO10  Integrated intensity of ^13^CO J=1-0 line
  78- 83  F6.3  Jy.km/s F13CO21  Integrated intensity of ^13^CO J=2-1 line
  85- 91  F7.3  Jy.km/s F13CO32  Integrated intensity of ^13^CO J=3-2 line
  93- 97  F5.3  Jy.km/s FC18O10  Integrated intensity of C^18^O J=1-0 line
  99-104  F6.3  Jy.km/s FC18O21  Integrated intensity of C^18^O J=2-1 line
 106-111  F6.3  Jy.km/s FC18O32  Integrated intensity of C^18^O J=3-2 line
 113-117  F5.3  Jy.km/s FC18O10l Integrated intensity limit of low
                                  abundance C^18^O J=1-0 line
 119-124  F6.3  Jy.km/s FC18O21l Integrated intensity limit of low
                                  abundance C^18^O J=2-1 line
 126-131  F6.3  Jy.km/s FC18O32l Integrated intensity limit of low
                                  abundance C^18^O J=3-2 line
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

History:
    From electronic version of the journal

================================================================================
(End)            Prepared by [AAS], Tiphaine Pouvreau [CDS]          06-Jul-2017
