The following document lists the file notes.dat
from catalogue J/A+A/430/603.
Also available:
plain copy of the file
with f77 program to read file
into arrays
or line by line
File is also available in
FITS,
Tab-separated format,
or in HTML.
## (from tabmap V6.0 (2016-08-18)) 2024-05-02T17:09:30 #--------------------------------------------------------------------------- #-- J/A+A/430/603 BVI photometry of LMC bar variables (Di Fabrizio+, 2005) #-------------------------------------------------------------------------- #---Table: J/A+A/430/603/./notes.dat Individual notes (54 records) # Note A1 --- Note code # Text A78 --- Text of the note -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N| o| t| e|Text -|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ a|The minimum light in 2001 is systematically brighter than in 1999 both in B a| and V, possibly indicating a Blazhko modulation. b|No reliable average magnitudes and amplitudes are available since in 1999 the b| star occasionally fell on a CCD bad column. c|The 2001 light curves are systematically fainter than the 1999 ones. The star c| could be an unresolved blend in the 1999 photometry. Amplitudes and average c| luminosities are provided for the 1999 (upper line) and 2001 data (lower c| line), separately. d|Amplitudes and average luminosities are provided for the combined 1999 + 2001 d| data (upper line), and for the 1999 (middle line) and 2001 data (lower line), d| separately. e|The 2001 light curves are systematically fainter than the 1999 ones. The star e| could either be an unresolved blend in the 1999 photometry, or could be e| affected by Blazhko effect. Amplitudes correspond to the 1999 data-set. f|The 2001 light curves are systematically brighter than the 1999 ones. f| Amplitudes and average luminosities are provided for the 1999 (upper line) f| and 2001 data (lower line), separately. g|Light curves are very noisy possibly indicating the presence of secondary g| periodicities. h|The 2001 light curves are systematically slightly brighter than in 1999, h| particularly in B. Amplitudes are provided for the combined 1999 + 2001 data h| (upper line), and for the 1999 (middle line) and the 2001 data (lower line), h| separately. i|Period and shape of the 2001 light curves are slightly different than in 1999. i| Amplitudes and average luminosities are provided for the combined 1999+2001 i| data (upper line) and for the 2001 data (lower line), separately. l|The star was not observed in 2001. m|Amplitudes and average luminosities are provided separately for the combined m| 1999 + 2001 data (upper line), for the 1999 data (middle line), and for the m| 2001 data (lower line). n|The 2001 light curves are systematically fainter than the 1999 ones. n| Amplitudes are provided separately for the combined 1999 + 2001 data (upper n| line), for the 1999 data (middle line), and for the 2001 data (lower line). o|Amplitudes are from the 1999 data set (upper line), average luminosities are o| from the combined 1999+2001 data set (lower line). p|The star was not observed in 2001. q|The 2001 light curves are systematically fainter than the 1999 ones. q| Amplitudes and average luminosities are provided for the 1999 (upper line) q| and 2001 data (lower line), separately. r|Amplitudes and average luminosities are provided for the 1999 (upper line) and r| 2001 data (lower line), separately. s|The star does not have V observations in 2001. The 1999 B light curve has a s| different shape and amplitude than the 2001 one. Amplitudes and average s| luminosities for the 1999 data are provided in the fist line, the B amplitude s| of the 2001 data in the second line. t|The 2001 light curves are systematically brighter and have smaller amplitudes t| than the 1999 ones. Both in 1999 and 2001 the V data provide a slightly t| different period than the B ones. Amplitudes and average luminosities are t| provided separately for the combined 1999 + 2001 data (upper line), for the t| 1999 data (middle line), and for the 2001 data (lower line), and for each of t| the two periodicities. u|The 2001 light curves are systematically fainter than the 1999 ones. u| Amplitudes are provided for the combined 1999 + 2001 data (upper line), for u| the 1999 data (middle line), and for the 2001 data (lower line), separately. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------